IG vs Pepperstone Comparison

Since I'm trading Clipper on live accounts with both IG Markets and Pepperstone (regular account), I thought it would be insightful to compare the two...

About the data

This analysis is based on Buy online cialis https://academicminute.org/paraphrasing/330-english-essays-book/3/ https://norfolkspca.com/medservice/cimetidina-y-sildenafil/14/ editing sheet research paper synthroid how long does it take to work assimilation and epenthesis here essay questions on lord of the flies https://preventinjury.pediatrics.iu.edu/highschool/medical-writing-companies-bangalore/14/ see url is synthroid weaker than thyroxine essay about immigration in us social science resume examples gardnerella zithromax nursing admissions essay learning english difficulties essay get online prescription for propecia dawn news paper today in english pakistan click hydrochlorothiazide for years https://eventorum.puc.edu/usarx/viagra-online-new-york/82/ kamagra bestellen schweiz analysis essay examples https://onlineinfo.hartford.edu/dosage/diflucan-inteaction-lopid/39/ enter harvard business school case study citation click here restate thesis statement examples levitra flavio mp3juices source link http://hyperbaricnurses.org/12811-viagra-online-sale-canada/ sexual side effects of synthroid 43 like-for-like trades i.e. trades that occured simultaneously with both brokers. Due to slight differences in the price feeds there were some trades that triggered with one broker but not with the other. This went both ways, but these trades were excluded from the analysis.

The Pepperstone data not include Razor accounts, since I don't yet have enough trades on my razor accounts to be meaningful. So this comparison is of similar account types with both brokers, ie:

• No brokerage/commission paid
• 1:200 leverage

Interest and swaps

One thing that made the analysis a little complex was in the area of interest and swaps.

For background, the swap is the interest paid (or received) on the funds required to hold the position. The swap rate is determined by the broker - based on international rates - and comprises:

• The differential of the base interest rates between the base currency and the quote currency.
• The differential of the account currency and the quote currency.
• Other risk allowances that the broker chooses to make.

The interest is proportional to the position size.

Pepperstone rolls this calculation into the MT4 trade transaction, using the 'Swap' field. For some reason, IG Markets put this into a separate transaction that usually appears right after the trade transaction on your statement.

Interest/swap charges are applied each time an open trade crosses GMT 22:00.

Commissions and brokerage

As mentioned above, the accounts in this analysis do not attract brokerage or commission; these costs are covered by the spread.

Results

Cutting to the chase, there is nothing startling about the comparison in that both brokers are comparable.

At the time of the trades in the study, the interest EURUSD and USDJY is a cost for both long and short trades, which supresses the profitability. Short trades on EURJPY and XAUUSD attract interest (i.e. we get paid interest), which boosts the profitability.

Pepperstone swap rates @ 20/Jul/2019

This table shows the swap rates from Pepperstone at the time of writing. Note that swap rates vary frequently and so these rates are not the same as those that were applied across the trades in the study. They are provided though to show the variation between both long and short swaps, and the difference between symbols/instruments.

The swap value is shown in Points per Contract whre a Point is 1/10 of a Pip.

To take an example (ignoring the Wednesday issue), a LONG EURUSD trade, of size 1 contract, that is open for 24 hours will attract a swap charge equivalent to -11.51 points = -1.15 pips.

A SHORT trade of 1 XAUUSD contract will attract a swap benefit of 6.99 points = 0.7 pips each time GMT 22:00 is passed.

Conclusion

The standard account types for IG Markets and Pepperstone are comparable on like-for-like Clipper trades.

Acknowledging the price feed differences will cause variation in the trades that same system will generate with each broker, this seems to be 'swings and roundabouts' - i.e. on the small amount of data that I have there seems no advantage one way or the other.

When i get more trading data on my Pepperstane Razor account I will revisit this analysis.